Stihl-tools.com

Gardening and landscaping
500 View
Article Rating
1 звезда2 звезды3 звезды4 звезды5 звезд

Stihl MS 180 and MS 181 – Which chainsaw should I choose?

The chainsaws Stihl MS 180 vs 181 at a glance

The Stihl MS 180 and MS 181 are both petrol chainsaws that are designed for work in the private sector and in craft businesses. Both chainsaws are equipped with the Stihl 2-MIX engine, which is known for its power and economy.

Comparison table Stihl ms 180 vs 181: technical data

propertyStihl MS 180Stihl MS 181
price€324.00€409.00
Displacement31.8 cm³31.8 cm³
bar length30-35 cm30-35 cm
Performance1.4/1.9 kW/hp1.5/2 kW/hp
weight4.1 kg4.3 kg
Power-to-weight ratio3 kg/kW2.9 kg/kW
System weight4.57 kg4.77 kg
Sound pressure level100 dB(A)100 dB(A)
Sound power level112 dB(A)112 dB(A)
vibration value6.6/7.8 m/s²3.5/3 m/s²
CO2859 g/kWh1039 g/kWh
Saw chain pitch3/8″ P3/8″ P

Stihl MS 180
Stihl MS 181

Design and optics Stihl MS 180 vs 181

In terms of design and appearance, both chainsaws are similar, as they feature the classic orange and gray of the Stihl brand. They’re both compact and sturdy, with a quality build you’d expect from Stihl.

Cutting times – which is faster?

Since both chainsaws have the same displacement and a similar performance, there should hardly be a significant difference in sawing times. Both the MS 180 and MS 181 are powerful and should be able to handle most sawing jobs efficiently.

Displacement

Both saws have a displacement of 31.8 cm³, which indicates an equally powerful engine.

bar length

The bar lengths of both saws are adjustable from 30 to 35 cm. This gives the user the flexibility to adjust the length to the specific sawing job requirements.

Weiterlesen:
Husqvarna 550 XP Mark II vs Stihl MS 261 - Which chainsaw should I choose?

Performance

The MS 181 has a slightly higher output than the MS 180, with 1.5 kW versus 1.4 kW. This could lead to slightly higher cutting speeds.

Weight

At 4.3 kg, the MS 181 is slightly heavier than the MS 180, which weighs 4.1 kg. The difference is minimal and should hardly be noticeable in general use.

Noise emissions

Both chainsaws have the same sound pressure level and sound power level, 100 dB(A) and 112 dB(A) respectively. They are therefore comparably loud in terms of noise development.

vibrations

The MS 181 offers lower vibration values ​​with 3.5/3 m/s² compared to the 6.6/7.8 m/s² of the MS 180. This means that the MS 181 generates less hand-arm vibrations, which can improve comfort and handling, especially for long-term use.

Differences Stihl MS 180 vs 181

Despite their similarities, there are some differences between the two chainsaws:

  1. Price: At €409.00, the MS 181 is slightly more expensive than the MS 180, which costs €324.00.
  2. Power: The MS 181 has a slightly higher power (1.5 kW compared to 1.4 kW for the MS 180), which could lead to slightly higher cutting speeds.
  3. Weight: At 4.3 kg, the MS 181 weighs slightly more than the MS 180 at 4.1 kg.
  4. Vibration levels: The MS 181 has lower vibration levels than the MS 180, which could result in more comfortable operation.

Similarities Stihl MS 180 vs 181

The two chainsaws also have a lot in common:

  1. Engine: Both chainsaws are equipped with the Stihl 2-MIX engine, which is known for its performance and economy.
  2. Bar length: Both chainsaws offer an adjustable bar length of 30 to 35 cm.
  3. Noise emissions: The noise levels of the two chainsaws are the same.
  4. Saw Chain Pitch: Both chainsaws use the same saw chain pitch of 3/8″ P.
Weiterlesen:
Carver brand chainsaw: description, specifications and reviews of owners

Conclusion comparing Stihl MS 180 vs 181

In summary, it can be said that both the Stihl MS 180 and the MS 181 are excellent chainsaws that are well suited for private applications and craft businesses. The choice between the two depends on your specific needs and budget. If you value less vibration and a little more power, the MS 181 might be a better choice for you. If budget is more of a concern, the MS 180 offers excellent value for money.

Ссылка на основную публикацию