Here is a comparison table showing the specifications of the Husqvarna 572 XP and the Stihl MS 462:
|Properties||Husqvarna 572 XP||Stihl MS 462|
|Displacement||70.6 cm³||72.2 cm³|
|Max. chain speed||22 m/s||Not given|
|Output power||4.3 kW||4.4 kW|
|CO2 emissions||841 g/kWh||697 g/kWh|
|Min. recommended splint length||38 cm||40 cm|
|Max. recommended rail length||70 cm||50 cm|
|chain type||C85||Not given|
|standard bar length||45 cm||40-50 cm|
|Weight (without cutting equipment)||6.6 kg||6 kg|
|Sound pressure level at operator’s ear||107 dB(A)||108 dB(A)|
|Sound power level||120 dB(A)||119 dB(A)|
|Vibration value (front handle)||5 m/s²||4.8 m/s²|
|Vibration value (rear handle)||4.1 m/s²||3.6 m/s²|
Stihl 462 and Husqvarna 572 are chainsaws designed for heavy-duty work. Both offer high performance, but there are differences between them that make them suitable for different people and types of work.
The Stihl air filter is one of the easiest to replace on the market. You just have to insert and twist to lock it in place. That’s it! There are even instructions printed right on the filter so you know exactly how to do it without having to search for anything.
The air filter on the Husqvarna 572 is a bit different than that on the Stihl 462. Well, the Husky has a cool handle, that’s a little different. Still, the air filter can be painlessly removed when you need it.
You probably know that rubber grips are comfortable. They make it easier to hold the chainsaw and prevent your hands from slipping during use.
The Husqvarna has a rubber grip, which is amazing. It’s really comfortable to hold and allows for better gripping of the chainsaw when working with it. However, it would definitely be useful to see this feature on the Stihl chainsaw as well.
When using a chainsaw you want to be sure that the chain brake handle stays in place. As such, one of the first things you’ll notice about the two different models is that the Husqvarna’s chain brake handle seems a little more fragile.
The Stihl chain brake handle, on the other hand, is sturdier and will take more abuse before it fails.
Low and high setting
The Stihl has low and high settings under the cap so you can just go there and turn them with a screwdriver. Half a turn counterclockwise is required for the lowest settings. For the maximum setting you have to turn clockwise. Everything is a little different with the Husqvarna. You will have to go through a more complicated process to complete the setup. Overall, the Stihl makes its job pretty painless.
Fuel economy is a major factor to consider when purchasing a new chainsaw, especially if you have a lot of work to do. The Stihl comes with a 24.35 ounce fuel tank while the Husky has a 24 ounce tank, ultimately not that much of a difference.
Since they have little difference in terms of power and engine power, it is difficult to say which of them consumes more oil. But as far as we can tell, they both work equally well in this area. You might consider this a draw!
Overall, both the Stihl 462 and the Husqvarna 572 are powerful and efficient chainsaws, each with their own advantages and disadvantages. Ultimately, your decision may depend on your individual preferences and work requirements. Both brands are known for their high quality and durable products, so no matter what you choose, you will make a good investment.
Which one is better? Husqvarna 572 XP vs Stihl MS 462?
Undoubtedly, these two chainsaws are the most popular on the market. Each of them has their strengths and weaknesses, but both are standout devices.
The Husqvarna 572 weighs about 14.5 pounds while the Stihl 462 weighs only 13 pounds. Well, that means you’ll have an easier time holding the 462 for long periods of time when you’re chopping down logs or other large pieces of wood.
On the other hand, the Husqvarna seems to run smoother and has less vibration, which is better for your hands and body. It’s also better balanced with a 24″ handlebar and has better air filtration. In addition, both chainsaws have fairly similar engine performance.
If you need more power or need to cut longer logs, the Husqvarna 572 might be a better choice for you. But if you’re looking for something lighter but still great, the Stihl 462 might be your best bet.